Study challenges assumptions on wartime sexual violence

ScienceDaily (Oct. 10, 2012) ? A new study by the Simon Fraser University-based Human Security Report Project (HSRP), released October 10 at the United Nations headquarters in New York, finds that there is no compelling evidence to support a host of widely held beliefs regarding wartime sexual violence.

The study, presented by HSRP director Andrew Mack, disputes the common assumption that conflict-related sexual violence is on the rise, and argues that the experience of a small number of countries afflicted by extreme levels of sexual violence is not the norm for all war-affected countries.

Key findings include:

• In more than half of the years in which countries around the world experienced conflict between 2000-2009, levels of reported conflict-related sexual violence were low to negligible.
• There is no evidence to support frequent claims that rape as a "weapon of war" is widespread, nor that its incidence has been growing.
• Domestic sexual violence victimizes far more women in war-affected countries than does the conflict-related sexual violence that is perpetrated by combatants.
• Recent studies show that male victims and female perpetrators may be more numerous than generally believed.
• The study also finds that the mainstream view of the impact of war on children's education as highly damaging is incorrect, and that educational outcomes in war-affected countries improve over time despite fighting, even in regions most affected by war.

Report: http://hsrgroup.org/docs/Publications/HSR2012/2012HumanSecurityReport-FullText.pdf

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

---

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Simon Fraser University.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.

---

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/J8YxvM64CvM/121010151424.htm

sweet caroline lottery winning numbers pro bowl roster quirky chrissy teigen chia seeds embers